Bob Butler wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2009 at 10:37pm:
You seem very knowledgeable about the past as well as the current state of Flower Mound and that says a lot, I think I can learn from you.
I think the only thing we really differ on is the current and future expansion of Flower Mound. I grew up 30 miles southwest of Denver, but moved to the city when I was 18 (I'm 39 now). I saw Denver go from a "Cow Town" to a "Down Town" and a lot of it was good, but with every positive, there is a negative. Same with you, you saw Flower Mound grow exponentially in the 90's and you liked a lot of what you got, but there was obviously some negatives. I'm all in favor of the hospital, it's the right kind of development for our town (which I call a city in protest to what's going on). That's the kind of development I would be in favor of, good paying jobs and good tax revenue for the town.
First, I would like to ask you if you have visited a competing site
http://www.roundthemound.com/?q=node/565#comment-2843I wonder if they are referring to you. The TOWN of Flower Mound does sound better, as does TOWN Council, and that is the official title that the CITY uses. But you are very much right about it truly being a CITY. A population of 50k+ according to most people. I wonder if these people who assume you're using the term incorrectly understand just WHY your using it. Unfortunately most voters for this particular election base their vote on signs, pamphlets, and who their friends like.
So what do you consider is "bad development?" Youre in favor of everything, just not right now?
Quote:I like to go with common sense, that's what my website and signs say and I mean it. Common sense tells me that in an economic down turn, you should hold off on new development. I keep asking myself who is going to fill up all of the retail shops in the River Walk when we can't keep our current retail and office spaces rented out?
Thats a good question, especially since I dont see Parker Square much of a success, as they have empty spaces too. But they went ahead with phase II of it. They managed to triple the size of the original Southlake complex, so Im sure some one will move in.
But despite what EVERYONE says, the economy really isnt that bad... ...at least here anyway. Sure, theres been over 60 homes foreclosed on. But not many here are losing jobs. The economy in DFW is very strong. Its no Detroit by any means. I got my dream job in the fall of 07, right when the economy started to tank making twice as much. My husband now makes also twice as much as he did, when he got his job in the Winter of 07. My brother lost his lost at Albertsons when it closed down (which I would have blamed due to poor management than a victim of the recession), but he had no problem finding work elsewhere.
Any construction, may it be building buildings or roads brings jobs. Residential construction was HUGE before the real estate bubble burst. Now all those people making a living building homes and paving driveways and foundations are able to find work this way.
You see, since retail, services, and other businesses screamed "city," commerce was the group the previous administration focused the most on. They did try their hardest to prevent residential (regardless of income) to be built, but they couldnt hold everything back. So when the town "exploded" There was very little commerce. You now had 40-50k people driving on little 2 lane farm to market roads driving an hour each way to their work, as well as traveling to Lewisville for groceries and fast food.
When my brother was your childrens age, If you wanted to go to McDonalds, Sonic, Chilis, you had to drive along with everyone else all the way to Lewisville, clogging up streets. If you wanted pizza, sure you could call in, but rather than avoid clogging up the streets more, you still had to drive all the way to Lewisville to pick it up, as they did not deliver that far. Now we have 2 McDonalds, 2 Chilis, 3 Sonics, and plethora of pizza places. Even with the abundance of places, its still too busy for me to ever go to. (no parking + too many people waiting to park) Meaning that more can and should be build. All this commercial growth is a response to all the residential growth that occurred before you came here. Thats why we need these roads, we need these businesses, we need these jobs.
Have you every played Sim City? If not, I highly success the game for you. Its more of a simulation really, than a game. If you have too many residencies, citizens complain about high taxes (since they have to pay for almost all of the towns budget) and traffic (since they ALL have to leave town to go to work) If you try to keep your residential, commerce and industrial separate, tax complaints decrease as now businesses share in the load, but traffic still remains bad because citizens still have to drive far from their homes to go where they need to go (which is why we have a Tom Thumb going up where the Bridlewood and Wellington area is.) Sure, like with the 3040 Kroger, Im sure residents nearby dont like the idea, but it sure lowered commute time, and decreased traffic and stress. Its a real cool game, very educational. You should really check it out if you havent yet.
I questioned why restaurants like Fridays, Texas Roadhouse, and others were building in this economy, even though they seem successful. A lot of the problem was by the time you get loans, investors, permits, land, etc, if a recession begins any time during that, youre already too invested to back out now. You can either give up and fail, or you can continue and hope you succeed. So the global economy was probably good when they started, and then tanked somewhere in the middle. I know the economy was good when I first heard about the riverwalk idea. A lot of time and money had already been wasted in that, especially if you consider having to deal with surveyors, environmentalists, impact studies, rendering etc.
If you havent yet, I suggest reading this old article (I didnt write it)
http://ww2.flowermound.net:8080/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1231995869It pretty much explains exactly how the town was back in the day as far as "growth" went.
Quote:I was at the Bridlewood Candidate's Forum tonight and some of the candidates said that it's not our problem, it's the Realtors and development owner's problem to fill that space. Really? They might lose a commission or some rent money, but it's an eye sore to us the residents of Flower Mound. So I think in the end, we lose both in the tax revenue we aren't collecting as well as the aesthetics of our town.
Clearly they dont know or understand the whole "broken window theory." Odds are they all live by the rules of HOAs, but dont understand their purpose. My neighborhood luckily does not have an HOA, but I still got a citation for having a "junked motor vehicle." In the towns mind, as well as the HOAs, Im contributing to "urban blight." Though I love my daily driver that I got when I was 14, they see it as ugly, a fire hazard, and a promotion of crime (increase chance of being vandalized, or parts stolen). Now a city can fine someone as much as they can before they seize it (and a vacant building could take years) but once they own it, then what? If the previous owner couldnt sell it in good conditional, the city sure isnt going to now. Tax payers will just have to keep paying more landscaping, and police patrols.
They also apparently dont understand what realtors do. They make money selling homes and leases to people. If no ones interested, they dont make money. But all the realtor is doing is helping the owner. It the owners fault if they cant lease out the space. If he/she fails, it SHOULD be their own mess. If it wasnt a good idea to build, why were permits issued and loans approved?
What it sounds like is youre saying that in this economy the likelihood of failure is larger, so why give anyone a chance? Lets just say that I wanted to start a business. The risk was always there that I could fail, but now that we're in a recession I have a bigger risk of failing. So I, nor anyone else should be given a chance? Just something to think about
Or how about this: Someone wants to smoke. It is legal for them to do so. Odds are they'll just abandoned whats left and leave the remains on the ground for us and everyone else to deal with. Yes, its there fault, yes we're left with the mess, but should we not allow them to ever smoke (build) just because might be a litterbug (abandoned vacant building)
Quote:Anyway, I'll quit boring you, but I'll leave you with this: I'm not as pro growth as Mike Wallace, but I'm not as anti-growth as the Voter's United you mentioned, I'm probably somewhere in between. Again, I'm not against growth, let's just make sure it's at the right time and for the right reasons.
Thats a better summary about what youre about. Right now the only thing that I see that qualifies for that type of viewpoint is the morriss expansion. Everything else, I really dont see. Riverwalk will be built in phases, so its not like we're going to be stuck with this HUGE empty complex, Just like with Wellington, Bridlewood, and other large communities/complexes, they build in phases, when those developments started to fill up, they started another phase. If for some reason they failed, the other phases would never be started. Theyre not putting all of their eggs in one basket.
There is indeed a lot of growth going on, but I doubt we will see a post apocalyptic suburbia in the future if nothing is changed
Visiting your website, I seem to agree with all of your positions except #1. #1 seems to clash with #5. SMARTgrowth works by restricting businesses and other things (making Home Depot change its sign, forcing businesses to plant more trees than they cut down, etc.) How can you be against more strip malls and office buildings, but also against restricting them? Restrictions are what scare builders and businesses away.
So youre not against growth, just growth right now? All growth, or just a specific type?
Also I would like it much if you pointed out to me these so called "vacant" spots. Ive seen a few, but thats because some businesses failed and left, but not so much where I would even consider it a "problem"
The only one I can see, is that area on the corner of Rippy Rd and 2499. Thats been there for years, and though I think its stupid that theyre paying for landscaping, and electrical (fountain and those two light bulbs) they have yet to build any buildings. I dont think its an "eyesore" nor does it contribute to urban blight, but I do think it was a waste of money. But it wasnt my money, so whatever. Theyre vacant, but probably because no one wants a business on a road like that. When 407 was being expanded Briarhill to Lewisville, many businesses closed because patrons couldnt get there. (We used to have a Jack in The Box) Once the road was finished, people moved in to the vacancies and more buildings were produced.
As for the Lakeside District, my companies building had been there for about a year before we moved in. Was it vacant? Not really. It just took them WAY longer to build. We really wanted in there, and in fact, half our company had to stay in NRH because it wasnt finished even several months AFTER we moved in. Its possible that these "vacancies" do have people wanting to move in, but theyre taking to long to complete. Its quite possible that the towns restrictions have something to do with it. An experience builder who is familiar with the way Flower Mound runs can finish a construction project (single building) in 3-6months. Someone unfamiliar with the system however may take much much longer, especially if permits expire.
Quote:p.s. - The people we bought our house from moved to Highland Village
A-Ha! So in a way you and your family ARE contributing to the mess... ...only because the people you bought the house from, as well as ALL HV utilize much of 2499, 407, and Morriss, as well as the businesses that are near there.

They left FM, but their usage hasnt decreased any.